The extraordinary, bizarre, and occasionally hilarious evolution of taxation — from ancient grain levies to GST, and everything in between.
Chapter One
The World’s Oldest Profession
(No, Not That One)
Long before spreadsheets, SAP, and Section 80C, humans were already taxing each other — and getting equally creative about avoiding it.
If you’ve ever grumbled about paying taxes, know this: you are part of a tradition stretching back at least 5,000 years. Taxation predates the wheel, the alphabet, and quite possibly the concept of a sensible government. It is, in fact, one of humanity’s oldest — and most reliably annoying — institutions.
The word “tax” itself comes from the Latin taxare, meaning “to appraise or estimate.” But long before the Romans coined the term, civilisations across the globe had already developed surprisingly sophisticated ways of relieving citizens of their wealth — all in the name of the greater good, of course.
“In this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes.”
— Benjamin Franklin, 1789. Clearly a man who had filed a return or two.
-
3000 BCAncient Egypt — The OG Tax Collector
The Pharaohs ran perhaps the world’s first organised tax system. Every two years, the Pharaoh conducted a “census of all wealth” — livestock, grain, gold. Failure to pay meant labour on royal projects. Tax officers, called “scribes,” were the most feared people in the Nile delta — a tradition that lives on in many finance ministries today.
-
600 BCAncient Greece — Tax as a Mark of Shame
In Athens, wealthy citizens were expected to voluntarily fund public services — festivals, warships, and athletic games — through a system called liturgy. Refusing was deeply shameful. In a delightful twist, citizens could challenge each other: if you claimed someone else was richer than you, that person either paid the liturgy or swapped all their property with you. Nothing like competitive philanthropy to keep the economy moving.
-
200 BC–400 ADThe Roman Empire — Tax Goes Industrial
Rome perfected the art of extracting money from conquered territories: a general income tax (tributum), a poll tax, a sales tax on slaves, and an inheritance tax. Rome also pioneered “tax farming” — selling the right to collect taxes in a region to private contractors who kept a profit margin. This was absolutely not corrupt at all. Definitely not.
-
500–1400 ADMedieval Europe — Pay the Feudal Lord, the Church, and Everyone Else
The medieval citizen operated under a delightful multi-layer system: pay a portion of crops to the local lord (tallage), 10% to the Church (tithe), and various levies to the Crown for wars, coronations, and royal weddings — yes, subjects were taxed when the king got married. The concept of “no taxation without representation” was centuries away. The concept of “taxation despite absolutely no representation whatsoever” was very much alive.
-
1799Britain Invents Income Tax — To Fight Napoleon
British PM William Pitt the Younger introduced the world’s first modern income tax in 1799 — a “temporary” measure to fund the Napoleonic wars. It was meant to last only as long as the war. Spoiler: income tax still exists in Britain. The rate started at 2 old pence per pound and rose to a maximum of 10% — roughly what a single Indian surcharge can add in certain assessments today.
-
1913
The United States — Making It Permanent and ConstitutionalAfter a brief Civil War–era income tax, the US permanently instituted federal income tax with the 16th Amendment in 1913. The top rate started at a modest 7% on incomes above $500,000, later peaking at 94% during World War II. The IRS was born, and with it, an entire genre of American comedy writing.
-
1954–PresentThe Age of Value Added Tax
The modern era brought the VAT, first introduced in France in 1954 by economist Maurice Lauré. The idea: tax the “value added” at each stage of production. This spread to 160+ countries. India’s version — the Goods and Services Tax — arrived in 2017. The rest of the world needed 63 years to adopt the idea. India spent those 63 years debating it in Parliament.
Chapter Two
Laws That Made the Accountants Laugh
(And Then Cry)
History is littered with taxation laws so bizarre, so magnificently misjudged, that they deserve their own Hall of Fame. Presented without further apology:
England, 1696
The Window Tax
King William III taxed windows. The more windows a house had, the more you paid. Citizens responded by bricking up their windows. The country plunged into literal darkness to avoid taxes. Doctors warned of epidemic disease from the loss of fresh air and light. The tax persisted for 156 years.
The original “lights out” austerity measure.
Russia, 1698
Peter the Great’s Beard Tax
Peter the Great wanted to modernise Russia. His solution? Tax beards. If you wanted to keep your facial hair, you paid an annual fee and received a brass token as proof. The amount varied by social class — nobles paid more than peasants. A tax on personal grooming: a concept that has since spawned an entire advisory sub-sector.
The original facial-hair surcharge. England, 1784
The Hat Tax
Britain taxed hats — from a halfpenny for a cheap one to 2 shillings for an expensive one. Forging a hat stamp was punishable by death. For a hat. A hat.
Fashion crime, quite literally.
The Illegal Drug Tax
Tennessee once required dealers of illegal drugs to anonymously purchase tax stamps for their controlled substances. Dealers who paid the tax received the stamps but received no immunity from prosecution. It was a tax on lawbreaking. Beautiful, in a horrifying way.
Compliance was, understandably, low.
The Shadow Tax
In the Italian city of Conegliano, businesses were charged a “shadow tax” if their awnings cast a shadow on public pavement. The logic: you are occupying public space with darkness, and darkness has a value. This is perhaps the only tax in history levied on the absence of light. Umbra ergo taxo.
The Coffin Tax Loophole
Austria once taxed coffins. To avoid paying repeatedly, some parishes created reusable coffins with a trapdoor at the bottom — the body would slide into the grave, and the coffin returned to the church. Economy, efficiency, and a certain grim ingenuity all in one.
Truly a circular economy.
The Blueberry Tax
Maine levies 1.5 cents per pound specifically on wild blueberries. Not farmed blueberries. Wild ones. Because apparently wild blueberries have a different tax destiny than their domesticated counterparts. The revenue funds blueberry research. The blueberries have not filed an appeal.
Foraged. And taxed.
The Dog Tax
Switzerland taxes dogs annually, with amounts calculated based on the dog’s weight. A Great Dane costs more to own, from a fiscal standpoint, than a Chihuahua. Switzerland is meticulous about everything, including canine fiscal obligations.
Bark if you want a rebate.
Chapter Three
Taxation in India — An Epic
Spanning 2,300 Years
India’s tax history is not a chapter — it is an entire library. From Kautilya’s Arthashastra to the GST Council meeting minutes, it spans empires, colonisers, and finance ministers with very strong opinions.
If you believe that the Indian government’s appetite for taxation is a modern phenomenon, the Arthashastra would like a word. Written around 300 BCE by Kautilya (also known as Chanakya) — the original finance minister who could give most modern economists a run for their money — this treatise laid down a comprehensive taxation system covering land, trade, customs, licences, tolls, and professional income. In short: Kautilya taxed everything that moved, and put a toll booth on everything that stood still.
The Arthashastra prescribed taxes on land (one-sixth of produce), customs duties (5–20%), taxes on manufactured goods, tolls on trade routes, and professional levies on artisans and merchants. It even described the state’s right to audit and the king’s obligation to treat taxpayers “like a bee extracts honey from a flower — without causing harm.” A beautiful analogy that budget presentations still attempt, with variable success.
The Delhi Sultanate introduced kharaj (land tax — one-third to half of produce), jizya (poll tax on non-Muslims), and various transit duties. Alauddin Khalji fixed market prices and penalised merchants who overcharged — he was a man who understood supply-side economics, primarily the supply going to him.
Akbar’s finance minister Raja Todar Mal revolutionised land taxation around 1580 with the Zabt system — surveying and classifying land into four productivity categories, standardising weights and measures, and calculating revenue based on the previous ten years’ average prices. This was India’s first attempt at scientific tax assessment — a precursor to what would later become “arm’s length pricing.”
The Company’s Permanent Settlement of 1793 fixed land revenue in perpetuity with zamindars, shifting all agricultural risk onto the peasantry. It also maintained internal customs barriers between provinces — essentially taxing internal trade in a way that would today violate GST principles entirely. The revenues extracted from India during this period are estimated at tens of trillions in modern terms — perhaps the most ambitious tax collection in history.
James Wilson — founder of The Economist and Finance Member of the British Viceroy’s Council — introduced the first Income Tax Act in India in 1860 to help the Crown recover losses from the 1857 uprising. The tax was 2% on incomes above ₹200 and was meant to be temporary. As with all temporary taxes in history, it became permanent. Indians were, in summary, paying income tax while simultaneously agitating for freedom — a particularly exhausting fiscal and political combination.
Post-Independence, India inherited a patchwork of colonial tax laws. After comprehensive review by the John Mathai Committee, the landmark Income Tax Act, 1961 was enacted — which continues to govern Indian income taxation today, though with so many amendments over 60+ years that the original Act resembles a palimpsest more than a statute.
This era brought progressive expansion of the income tax base, introduction of TDS as a withholding mechanism, the launch of PAN (made universal in 1995), computerisation of the Income Tax Department, and e-filing of returns from 2006. India’s direct tax-to-GDP ratio remained stubbornly low throughout — reflecting both the difficulty of taxing a largely informal economy and the extraordinary creativity of the Indian taxpayer in locating deductions.
On the midnight of 30th June–1st July 2017, in a special joint session of Parliament modelled on India’s original independence ceremony, the Goods and Services Tax came into force. After 17 years of deliberation and 14 years of committee reports, India replaced a maze of 17 major indirect taxes and 23 cesses with a single (well, four-rate) structure. Prime Minister Modi called it a “good and simple tax.” The first GSTR filing season gently disagreed. But the intent — and the architecture — were genuinely transformational.
Chapter Four
India’s Own Hall of Tax Legends
India’s tax history has its own remarkable cast of contradictions and classifications that have kept tax professionals simultaneously employed, entertained, and reaching for antacids.
GST Council
Paratha vs. Roti — The Great Flatbread Schism
The AAR ruled that plain rotis attract 5% GST while parathas attract 18% — because parathas require more preparation to cook. India’s legal system was thus called upon to adjudicate the philosophical difference between a roti and a paratha. Legal philosophers are divided. Grandmothers are not.
Your tawa, now a fiscal device.
GST Classification
Pickle: The 12% Condiment Controversy
Pickle (achar) attracts 12% GST. The same preserved vegetables in a slightly different preparation may attract a different rate. Tax practitioners have filed advance rulings on whether a chutney is a sauce, a sauce is a pickle, and where precisely the pickle ends and the relish begins. The GST HSN code for “preparations of vegetables” spans 40+ sub-headings.
Every jar now requires a tax opinion.
Pre-GST History
The Playing Card Tax
India levied a specific excise duty on playing cards under the Central Excise Act — distinct from the tax on casino games, gambling, or the emotional toll of losing at rummy. The duty was calculated per pack. The government had taken a considered position on leisure activities involving 52 cards and two jokers.
Dealt a tax hand.
Wealth Tax
The Tax That Taxed Itself
India’s Wealth Tax Act (1957–2015) taxed “non-productive” assets — jewellery, urban land, cars above a threshold, yachts. It raised a modest ₹1,000 crore per year while costing the government ₹600 crore to administer. It was abolished in 2015 by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, who perhaps ran the cost-benefit numbers.
A tax worth less than itself.
Amusement Tax
Tax on Entertainment Before It Was Cool
Many Indian states levied an “amusement tax” on cinema tickets, amusement parks, cable TV, and live performances. One state legislature spent significant floor time debating whether a theme park ride counted as “amusement” or “sport” — with different rates applicable. The distinction between fun and sport has troubled philosophers for centuries. Now it troubles CAs too.
Joy: now attracting a cess.
GST Curiosities
Popcorn’s Three-Tier Existence
The GST Council clarified: salted/plain popcorn = 5%; caramelised popcorn = 18% (as a sugar confectionery); popcorn sold inside a cinema = 12% (as restaurant service). The same food item has three tax identities depending on preparation and location. Professional advice is strongly recommended before your next movie outing.
Popcorn: most complicated snack in fiscal history.
Chapter Five
Income Tax in India — The Full Journey
From James Wilson’s 2% experiment in 1860 to a dual-regime system with AIS, faceless assessments, and TIS — the Indian income tax has come a remarkably long way.
164 Years of Income Tax in India
The Income Tax Act of 1961 has been amended by nearly every Finance Act since its enactment. It currently runs to over 700 sections, 23 chapters, and several thousand sub-clauses — a body of law so vast that it has spawned an entire ecosystem of commentaries, circulars, notifications, advance rulings, tribunal orders, and high court judgments, each of which may be cited against you at any time.
The most significant structural change in recent decades was the introduction of the New Tax Regime in Budget 2020 (Section 115BAC), offering lower tax rates in exchange for foregoing most deductions and exemptions. Initially optional, the new regime became the default regime from FY 2023-24. The 2025 Union Budget further liberalised it substantially.
Key Features of Current Income Tax Administration
- Faceless Assessment & Appeals — no physical interface with tax officer
- Annual Information Statement (AIS) — pre-populated return data
- TDS/TCS regime — 30+ sections covering various payment types
- Updated Return (ITR-U) — file/correct within 24 months of AY end
- New income tax e-filing portal with pre-filled ITR functionality
- Vivad se Vishwas — dispute resolution scheme (reinstated 2024)
- CBDT Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) for transfer pricing cases
- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) — over 63 benches nationwide
- Taxpayer’s Charter — legally enforceable rights from 2020
- Crypto/VDA taxation — 30% flat rate + 1% TDS under Sec 115BBH/194S
Chapter Six
GST — One Nation, One Tax, Many Forms
The Goods and Services Tax — India’s most ambitious tax reform — replaced a labyrinthine structure of central and state levies with a unified framework. Here’s what you need to know.
Prior to July 1, 2017, a manufacturer in India dealt with: Central Excise Duty, Additional Excise Duty, Service Tax, Countervailing Duty, Special Additional Duty, VAT, Central Sales Tax, Octroi (in certain states), Entry Tax, Purchase Tax, Luxury Tax, Entertainment Tax, and several more — all with different rates, different forms, different deadlines, and different officers.
GST replaced all of this with a dual-structure system: CGST for the Centre’s share, SGST/UTGST for the state’s share, and IGST for inter-state transactions.
Key GST Compliance Framework
- GSTR-1: Monthly/quarterly outward supplies statement
- GSTR-3B: Monthly summary return with tax payment
- GSTR-9: Annual GST return (turnover above ₹2 crore)
- GSTR-9C: Reconciliation statement (turnover above ₹5 crore)
- E-way Bill: Mandatory for goods movement above ₹50,000
- E-invoicing: Mandatory for B2B invoices (threshold progressively lowered)
- Input Tax Credit (ITC): Available only on GSTR-2B reconciled purchases
- RCM (Reverse Charge): Recipient liable on specified supplies
- QRMP Scheme: Quarterly returns, monthly payments for small taxpayers
- GST Audit: Department-conducted; AAR rulings for classification disputes
Chapter Seven
Taxation in India — 2026
The Current Landscape
Where does Indian taxation stand today? It’s more digital, more automated, and considerably more connected than at any point in the 2,300-year arc we’ve traced.
The year 2026 finds Indian tax administration at a fascinating inflection point. The government has consistently moved toward a philosophy of “trust first, verify digitally” — replacing adversarial in-person assessments with algorithm-driven risk profiling, AI-assisted scrutiny selection, and faceless proceedings. For the compliant taxpayer, the experience has genuinely improved. For the non-compliant one, the net has become far harder to escape.
“We want to make the tax system simpler — not simple, but simpler. One is aspirational, the other is possible.”
— The view of most Indian tax policymakers, paraphrased accurately but not quoted.
| Direct Tax — Key 2026 Provisions | Indirect Tax / GST — Key 2026 Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most significant development of 2025 was the introduction of the New Income Tax Bill 2025 — passed after joint committee review to replace the Income Tax Act, 1961. The new Bill simplifies language, removes redundant provisions, restructures the Act into clearer chapters, and introduces several taxpayer-friendly procedural changes. It is, in the Finance Ministry’s words, “not a new tax law, but a cleaner old one.” Tax professionals are cautiously optimistic. The commentary industry is less so — an entirely new corpus awaits authorship.
On GST, the push toward a three-rate rationalisation — merging the 12% and 18% slabs into a single middle rate — remained the dominant policy discussion through 2025-26. Several GoM recommendations were pending at the time of writing.
Final Word
From Kautilya’s Grain Levy to GSTR-3B
Across 5,000 years and six continents, one truth has remained constant: governments will always find new things to tax, citizens will always find creative ways to minimize it, and somewhere in the middle, a tax professional will earn a perfectly honest living helping both sides understand the rules. The forms change. The principle does not.
“The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest amount of feathers with the least possible amount of hissing.”
— Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Finance Minister of France, 1665. Some things don’t change.
